- 1Customer missionTemu decision — same customer with relevant memory
- set of five matching containers with lids
- each container 1-2 litres (glass or BPA-free plastic)
- delivered total at most the customer's budget ceiling
- delivery within 8 days, as stated on retailer's own pages
- 2Evidence16 searches, 8 pages: amazon.com, walmart.com, target.com
- 3BeliefNothing established about the brand
- 4DecisionNever entered the comparisonNONEAfter 24 page/search actions, no offer could be confirmed against all required facts using the retailer's own pages. Walmart.com and Amazon.com blocked every direct page …
Temu
The agent never even considered Temu.
In four journeys Temu was not among the options the agent weighed and its site was never requested; no retailer was recommended.
Open-market search Five kitchen containers, delivery time and returns required · tested 2026-09-20
4 customer-agent journeys
- Temu entered consideration in 0.
- It was selected in 0 and not selected in 0.
- In 4, no readable Temu-owned page was reached.
Decision trace (one journey)
Why Temu was not selected
One label per journey, from the record. By recorded outcome: never entered the comparison 2 · ran out of page reads before deciding 2.
Same task, different memory
Memory did not change the outcome in these journeys; see what it changed on the Memory page.
4 of 4
0 of 4
Where its facts came from
0
decisive beliefs about Temu taken from a page that is not the brand’s own, or from a brand page that refused the agent; 0 journeys met a bot wall on the brand site.
What this does not establish: that Temu generally wins or loses customers this way, or that changing one page would change these decisions. It establishes what happened in these 4 journeys.
The numbers
4 customer-agent journeys. Temu entered consideration in 0. It was selected in 0 and not selected in 0. In 4, no readable Temu-owned page was reached.
View strongest trace → Open story and traces →What remains unresolved
- Action budget ran out before the brand: 2 of 4 journeys
- Never entered the comparison: 2 of 4 journeys
What could be tested
The same customer missions, run again with the open condition readable on Temu’s own pages, against these 4 journeys as the baseline. That is a comparison, not a guess: same customer, same requirements, one change.
Investigated with Accord
Accord holds the customer requirements, Temu’s published conditions and this journey evidence in one Decision Case, runs the comparison, and records what changed. For brands and CX teams →
Work at Temu?
Send us the source the agent couldn’t find. We’ll rerun the same customer and publish the before/after. Send the source How the rerun works
Decisions
All journeys
- 1Customer missionTemu decision — same customer with relevant memory
- delivered total for the set of five ≤ $45 USD, as stated by the retailer
- delivery within 8 days of ordering, as promised on the retailer's own pages
- return window of at least 30 days, as stated by the retailer
- refund paid within 10 days of return receipt, as stated by the retailer (preference)
- 2Evidence13 searches, 11 pages: walmart.com, target.com, help.target.com, amazon.com
- 3BeliefNothing established about the brand
- 4DecisionNever entered the comparisonNONEThe best physical match found was the NutriChef 5-Piece Superior Glass Food Storage Containers Set sold via Target.com's Target Plus marketplace: all five containers are …
- 1Customer missionTemu decision — customer with no relevant memory
- 2Evidence17 searches, 6 pages: walmart.com, target.com, amazon.com
- 3BeliefNothing established about the brand
- 4DecisionRan out of page reads before decidingNo decision: the action budget ran out after 6 page reads, before a readable Temu page.
- 1Customer missionTemu decision — same customer with relevant memory
- set of five matching containers with lids
- each container 1-2 litres (glass or BPA-free plastic)
- delivered total at most the customer's budget ceiling
- delivery within 8 days, as stated on retailer's own pages
- 2Evidence16 searches, 8 pages: amazon.com, walmart.com, target.com
- 3BeliefNothing established about the brand
- 4DecisionNever entered the comparisonNONEAfter 24 page/search actions, no offer could be confirmed against all required facts using the retailer's own pages. Walmart.com and Amazon.com blocked every direct page …
- 1Customer missionTemu decision — customer with no relevant memory
- 2Evidence11 searches, 13 pages: amazon.com, wayfair.com, walmart.com, target.com +4
- 3BeliefNothing established about the brand
- 4DecisionRan out of page reads before decidingNo decision: the action budget ran out after 13 page reads, before a readable Temu page.